Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In

Advocates with Bike East Bay are taking developers of the proposed new Oakland A's ballpark to task for a lack of bike access in the project's draft environmental documents.

From a Bike East Bay statement:

The new Oakland A’s ballpark at Howard Terminal could be a home run for great bikeway, transit, and walking connections—but it’s not there yet. Proposed connections from Downtown Oakland, Chinatown, and Lake Merritt BART still fall short of what a project of this size should achieve.

And:

There are obviously many pedestrian improvements in this plan and we support all of them, including the many new sidewalks, wider sidewalks, pedestrian bridge and upgraded crosswalks and bulb outs. Similarly, the transit improvements are all good and we like the Transportation Hub on 2nd Street, but we have concerns about who will pay for the new transit services needed to get people to and from the ballpark. The DEIR [environmental report] leaves that to future discussions, but there needs to be a real plan to fund and ramp up transit services for game day crowds.

But most importantly to Bike East Bay:

This major project and its transportation plan should include high-quality, low stress separated bikeways from all directions and it lacks such bikeways from Downtown Oakland and from the Lake Merritt BART Station (and from points southeast). Buffered bike lanes on busy streets, and especially streets before and after ballgames, are not low-stress bikeways, and the door-zone white stripe on 2nd Street is no bikeway at all.

There's much more to unpack and it's definitely worth a read of Bike East Bay's entire critique, which makes it clear bike access was not truly considered by the study designers and the plan needs work. It's telling that the project's transportation page talks about transit and fencing in pedestrians, but barely mentions bikes as a transportation option. Clearly, Bike East Bay will have their work cut out for them.

Streetsblog encourages readers to make their own comments on the plans, which will be accepted until April 27, 4 p.m. (Note the comment period was extended from April 12).

Want to learn more? Next Tuesday, April 6, 5:30-6:30 p.m., Bike East Bay will be moderating a town hall to discuss these issues. RSVP HERE to attend.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Op/Ed: The Cameras We Fear and the Speed We Ignore

We can hold two ideas at once. Surveillance systems that accumulate unchecked power deserve opposition. Tools that are narrow, transparent, and built with statutory guardrails deserve evaluation on their merits.

February 27, 2026

The Week in Short Video

Fresno ballot measures, wild armadillos, gas tax holidays, and four miles of mid-city Los Angeles subway opening in May

February 27, 2026

Friday’s Headlines

We wanted e-bike incentives. They offered EV rebates. But maybe we'll get nothing.

February 27, 2026

Americans Demand Congress Fund Active Transportation In Next Infrastructure Bill — And Not Just The Bike/Walk Advocates

A "back to basics" surface transportation bill — as Republicans are seeking — would be devastating for road safety and small businesses.

February 26, 2026

“Stop Super Speeders Act” Takes Aim at California’s Most Dangerous Drivers

Bill would stop super speeders after they're caught and hopefully before they kill.

February 26, 2026

SGV Bus Rapid Transit Gets Another $3.9M for Study and Design

Early improvements combine for about 14 miles of continuous bus lanes, expected to be installed in advance of the 2028 Olympic games.

February 26, 2026
See all posts