Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Streetsblog USA

Slapping Flashy Crosswalks on Stroads Misses the Point of Complete Street

Leveraging technology, data, engineering, & education solutions to improve Florida transportation safety #FDOT100 pic.twitter.com/5SIKgeJlqS

— FLORIDA DOT (@MyFDOT) December 3, 2015

This Tweet from the Florida Department of Transportation last week was intended to exemplify the agency's efforts to make walking and biking safer on the state's notoriously deadly roads.

In FDOT's defense, this is a huge task. But Jesse Bailey at Walkable West Palm Beach says the agency is highlighting the wrong stuff:

Here are a couple observations.

  • Who is this crosswalk serving? Look at the adjacent land uses. Largely undeveloped other than a few intersecting low volume roadways. There are no visible sidewalks in the photo parallel to the right of way. And there shouldn’t be, because this road section is well designed for high speed car travel. And that’s a good thing. We get into trouble when we confuse roads and streets, which have very different objectives. This is a well designed road, designed for moving cars quickly from A to B. Putting “pedestrian bling” in the clear zone just confuses matters and creates truly dangerous obstacles for high speed vehicular travel
  • The “crosswalk” street name signage is cute, but completely ineffective in this environment. It’s human scale signage designed to be read at human speed (less than 20 mph), not in a car doing 50+ mph.
  • Push button and flashing pedestrian light complete with decorative pole. All the trappings of a safe street environment. None of the effectiveness, in practice.
  • The notion that we should expect cars to stop on a dime for a pedestrian in this environment is absurd. Six lanes, three in each direction, with speeds easily exceeding 50 mph just guessing from the road geometry.

Just as walkability advocates need to be rigorous about the places where walkability makes sense, we also need to be rigorous about places where it doesn’t make sense. FDOT, spare us the pedestrian bling and save your money on creating safer, better pedestrian infrastructure where it makes sense and will be used.

Elsewhere on the Network today: The Urbanist considers different proposals for Seattle's big light rail expansion plan. The Missouri Bicycle and Pedestrian Federation outlines the notable policies for walking and biking infrastructure in the new federal transportation bill.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Bipartisan Team of Assemblymembers Introduce DUI/Traffic Safety Laws

After CalMatters reporting showed how CA is failing when it comes to holding drunk drivers accountable with deadly results, some legislators are trying (again) to strengthen the state's laws

February 2, 2026

Bay Area Bicyclists Honor Alex Pretti

The Bay Area joins national rides in solidarity with a cyclist murdered by federal agents in Minnesota.

February 2, 2026

Eyes on the Street: WeHo Paints All of its Bike Lanes Green

West Hollywood is installing modest safety improvements on Fairfax Avenue, San Vicente Boulevard, and Santa Monica Boulevard.

February 2, 2026

Monday’s Headlines

The Alex Pretti rides were just one act of protest in California. And of course there's lots of other news out there too.

February 2, 2026

Comment on Metro L.A. River Path Project by Monday, February 2

I have some strong opinions about the L.A. River walk/bike path. I have advocated for L.A. River bikeways since the 1990s. I wrote a book about the L.A. River. Here’s my take on Metro’s latest frustrating attempt to complete the river path. The post concludes with talking points and my comment letter which you might…

January 30, 2026

The Week In Short Videos

Delayed subways, transit measures, dangerous streets, and Alex Pretti rides

January 30, 2026
See all posts