Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Streetsblog USA

“Places I Don’t Want to Sit” — A Gallery of Sad Public Spaces

Gracen Johnson at Strong Towns says this gazebo in an office park parking lot is a great example of a terrible public space.
Gracen Johnson at Strong Towns is gathering a collection of terrible public spaces, like this gazebo in a parking lot.
I-980 in Oakland is the subject of a study on the feasibility of removing or at least improving it

Gracen Johnson at Strong Towns has tapped into something universal with her post "Places I Don't Want to Sit." The above photo sums it up nicely: lousy, leftover spaces with public amenities grafted on as an afterthought. Since the whole surrounding parking lot is so hostile to people, why would anyone want to sit there?

There's an epidemic of sad spaces like this in America, she says. How are we getting it so wrong and what would it take to get it right?

We live in cities starved for good public space. There are so few spots in North America where you can sit comfortably (ie. safe, shaded, with a good perch/chair) and enjoy the city around you with zero expectation of spending money. It's a fact made more tragic when you realize how simple and cheap it can be to create wonderfully sittable space. Instead, many of our highest-potential urban environments are built to explicitly un-sittable standards using defensive architecture.

Other times, we do try to create linger-worthy public space and fail spectacularly. We often demand developers throw some cash toward green space or public amenities in order to get approval for construction. You see it all the time in subdivisions with exquisite landscaping, roundabouts, and benches that are only appreciated from behind a car window.

The idea of asking developers to contribute to public space is excellent (perhaps essential). By the looks of it, this has resulted in millions upon millions of dollars invested in pavilions, seating, greenery, and water features. Too bad that investment keeps ending up in places where no one would actually want to linger...

Strong Towns is urging readers to share their own examples -- bad and good -- with #PlacesIDontWantToSit and #PublicSpaceDoneWell.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Broken Sidewalk explains how Louisville is trying to tackle its pedestrian safety problem. Greater Greater Washington says Tyson's Corner just got a series of road diets that promise to make it more walkable. And Bike Portland reports the city's "neighborhood greenways" program is on the verge of being improved and enshrined permanently in city policy.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Wednesday’s Headlines

We're back from break! - BTW, we're not publishing on Friday so Damien can travel.

November 12, 2025

House T&I Chair Vows ‘No Money for Bikes or Walking’ in Fed Transportation Bill

The outlook for active transportation won't be good if advocates don't stand up.

November 11, 2025

Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Anniversary Ride: a Bittersweet Celebration

The mood was festive. But the loss of the lane during the week weighed heavily on advocates.

November 10, 2025

Veteran’s Day Weekend Headlines

Streetsblog CAL will be off the rest of today and tomorrow.

November 10, 2025

Advocates Respond to Mayor Lurie’s District 4 Pick Beya Alcaraz

Mayor's choice to replace Engardio is a newcomer. What will this mean for the future of Sunset Dunes?

November 7, 2025

CalBike Demands Statewide Permanent Fund for E-Bikes

The first step is for the state to admit it's trying to end the program. The second step should be making a better program.

November 7, 2025
See all posts