Skip to content

Update: E-bike Incentives Are Funded, Policy Bill Will Add Equity Guidelines

$10 million has been set aside in the state budget to help people in California buy e-bikes. An accompanying policy bill, A.B. 117, will contain rules to make sure the money goes to people who need it most.
Bikes parked in front of the California State Capitol building in Sacramento

Last week Streetsblog California reported that the state budget will allocate $10 million to help people buy e-bikes, and mistakenly wrote that an accompanying policy bill had stalled in committee.

It had not.

A.B. 117 is still very much alive, and has passed the Assembly and the Senate Transportation Committee. It will be heard on Monday by the Senate Environmental Quality Committee.

The bill originally had provisions in it to help guarantee that the money would go to the people who need it most, so as to avoid simply creating a handout for people who can well afford to buy e-bikes.

E-bikes are extremely popular, and growing more so. They aren’t cheap, but they are a great substitute for many types of trips people now take in cars. They are cheaper and have a much lower carbon footprint than any other electric vehicle, and California should be encouraging their adoption by as many people as possible.

But that doesn’t mean the state has to pay for everyone to have one.

The author of A.B. 117, Assemblymember Tasha Boerner Horvath (D-Encinitas), intends to use the bill to create guidelines for the incentives program, which will fall under the Clean Vehicle Rebate programs run by the Air Resources Board. In addition to finding a way to prioritize people with lower incomes, the program would be structured to give our vouchers, rather than a rebate. That would make it easier for people without the ability to raise funds ahead of time to take advantage of the program.

She also wants to ensure that the program can be used for a variety of bike types, for different abilities and uses. And some of the funding would be available for bike education and safety programs.

These provisions were removed when the bill was in the Assembly Appropriations Committee, but at the recent Senate Transportation Committee hearing Boerner Horvath said she plans to include them in the final bill at some point before it is, with luck, passed and signed by the Governor.

The bill has no official opposition, and is supported by a wide variety of advocacy organizations as well as cities and counties, including Los Angeles, San Mateo, Alameda, and SANDAG.

Meanwhile the budget bill that appropriates the $10 million to the program is still waiting to be signed by the Governor.

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog California

Wednesday’s Headlines

April 15, 2026

Where the Hottest Blocks in Your City Are — And How To Cool Them Down

April 14, 2026

Check Out ‘Wilshire Subway’ Book and Exhibition

April 14, 2026

AC Transit, Muni, Caltrain Predict Service Collapse Without More Funding

April 14, 2026
See all posts