Governor Brown Signs Law Allowing Bicycle Ticket Diversion Programs

Sgt. David Krumer of the LAPD at a Critical Mass ride in 2010. Image: Damien Newton/Streetsblog
Sgt. David Krumer of the LAPD at a Critical Mass ride in 2010. Image: Damien Newton/Streetsblog

A new law just signed by Governor Jerry Brown will make it possible for bicyclists who are ticketed for certain infractions to attend a class on safe bicycle riding and thus reduce their fines.

The bill, A.B. 902, has been tracked by Streetsblog since it was introduced by Assemblymember Richard Bloom (D-Santa Monica) in February. Sponsored by the California Bicycle Coalition, it was amended a few times, but survived the process of squeezing through the legislature with mostly minor changes.

“When a bicyclist is ticketed for a moving violation in California, they by default receive the same monetary fine as when driving a motor vehicle. This means that with court fees added a stop sign violation can cost around $200, and running a red light around $400,” explained Bloom.

“The penalty should be determined so as to encourage safe behavior and not so punitive that it discourages bicycling altogether, especially for low-income individuals who rely the most on bicycling for everyday transportation.”

One of the changes clarified that any class taken in lieu of a fine would have to be “sanctioned by law enforcement.” Robert Prinz, Education Coordinator at Bike East Bay, who worked on putting the bill forward, said this was an important clarification.

“That means there would have to be a certain level of standard for the information provided in the class,” he pointed out. Also, he said, “for the most part law enforcement has a pretty good idea of what’s important for bicycle safety, but some police departments would benefit from attending some of these classes themselves.”

The other change to the bill removed a requirement that classes be offered free of charge. This was originally included because it created more of an incentive for people to take safety classes, and also because it’s the way Bike East Bay handles its education programs. But other advocacy organizations didn’t want to restrict their own, not-yet-in-existence programs in this way.

Whichever way a program is set up, the hoped-for result is a reduced fine and a more educated and knowledgeable bike rider.

Prinz points out that it will take some work to set up education programs where none exist now, and that it’s up to local bicycle advocacy groups to get the ball rolling. To that end, Bike East Bay has been working with other advocacy groups to formulate the best programs for local needs. Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition, the city of Long Beach, and the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition have all expressed interest in creating diversion programs. Davis already has an on-campus diversion program and is interested in expanding it citywide. The cities of Huntington Beach and Alameda both used to have programs but suspended them because of a legal prohibition against them in the existing vehicle code. The Marin County Bicycle Coalition already has a diversion program, which it has been able to run because of strong local support from the police and courts.

“For sure it’s going to be easier to get these programs going in areas with established advocacy organizations,” said Prinz. “In rural or less populated areas there is going to be a need for outreach and education.”

Bike East Bay currently incorporates a diversion program into its regular educational offerings. Like Davis, UC Berkeley has its own police department that issues citations on campus. For on-campus infractions, ticketed bicyclists can attend a class, bring proof of attendance to the police, pay a fee, and have the ticket destroyed. The fee, around $50, is much less than what they would have to pay for a ticket if it went through the court system.

“Most police departments will hold a ticket for anywhere from thirty to sixty days before sending it on” to the courts, says Prinz. “So if ticketed cyclists attend one of our classes during that time, the ticket never gets sent to the courthouse, so there are no added-on fines,  no court costs at all.” This system greatly simplifies the entire process by limiting the exchange of money to a single transaction between the ticketed individual and the police.

Bike East Bay funds its classes through grants, and receives a flat fee for its classes, no matter how many students show up for it. This way it doesn’t need to rely on a minimum number of students to support its education program—nor on a minimum number of ticketed bicyclists—and, importantly, it can make the classes available to anyone who wants to take them.

There are 33 cities in the East Bay, and Bike East Bay would need to set up agreements with local police departments in all of them. “There are some cities where we don’t have any regularly scheduled classes,” said Prinz. “This could be an impetus to get those police departments involved and get classes set up there.”

Once a program is approved, said Prinz, individual officers don’t even need to have a lot of knowledge about the program. “UC Berkeley police use a sticker on the back of citations that have information about our classes,” he said, which include a phone number and information about signing up for classes.

The monetary benefit to an individual could be huge. “A $500 ticket can be a significant financial burden,” said Prinz, “and delay in taking care of it can cause even further consequences. But for the state or county, there is little monetary impact from creating these diversion programs because there are such a small number of bicyclist citations written every year compared to the number of motor vehicle citations.”

So even if a large number of bicyclists are able to take advantage of these programs, it won’t cause a significant loss of revenue to the courts. “If we’re successful in increasing bicycle mode share,” said Prinz, “and if there’s a huge jump in the number of ticketed bicyclist, we might have to revisit this in ten years.”

The bill is likely to take effect on January 1, 2016.

  • Pingback: Ticket Diversion for Bike Riders 101 – Streetsblog California()

  • Pingback: Webinar Offered Wednesday: How to Set Up a Bicycle Traffic Diversion Program – Streetsblog California()

  • DG

    If this just became legal, how was Marin doing it already? What am I missing?

    • Prinzrob

      The Marin program was made possible via a special allowance and exception provided by the county court (same thing in Santa Cruz County), although from my perspective there was always the chance these programs could have been shut down due to the vehicle code prohibition. Most other cities and counties around the state were not as open to providing exceptions, as I personally found out when the new City of Alameda police chief shut down our Bike East Bay diversion program which had been in operation there for a year.

      This code change makes Bike Traffic School programs specifically legal on a city or county level, without any exceptions or justifications needed, so the next step is for advocates to start working with their local police departments or county courts to get them up and running in their municipalities.

  • User_1

    Glad you asked!

    The tickets I’d like to see officers step up on passing out is tickets for traveling the wrong way on a bike. This is so dangerous for bicyclists traveling in the right direction and even for the bicyclists traveling the wrong direction. So many times I see these wrong way travelers riding at night with no lights or a helmet. Talk about a death wish!

  • calwatch

    Now if only law enforcement would approve the content of auto traffic school courses. Most of them are (literally) either jokes of content or “online” courses where you just have to have the browser open for the minimum amount of time.

  • neroden

    There is a deep problem with the concept of assessing “court fees” to people involuntarily caught up in the court system. It needs to be eliminated.

  • Mike

    UNRELATED:

    I just came across the legal documents regarding the lawsuit against the city for MP 2035. It conveniently lists contact information from the opposition.. Don’t be afraid to have some words with those leading the charge for car haven LA.

    https://zwartztalk.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/help-ccla-v-city-of-la-re-mp-2035.pdf

    Going through the argument is entertaining, and almost completely unsupported. Thankfully, that should go over well!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

CA Legislative Update: ATP, Bikes, and Budget

|
California budget negotiations have moved into high gear with the naming of Senate and Assembly members to the bicameral budget conference committee. Leaders of the two bodies named five members each—up from three in previous years—and the conference committee held its first hearing this morning. The committee’s job is to find agreement among the three […]

California Streetsies: Richard Bloom for Legislator of the Year

|
Welcome to the California-wide Streetsie awards! SBCA did things a little differently from our sister Streetsblog sites for this first-ever round of California Streetsies. Instead of inviting our informed readers to weigh in, SBCA editors are selecting a few noteworthy recipients. Let us know if you agree, or who else you think deserves a California Streetsie […]

Legislative Update: CalBike Agenda for 2016

|
The California Bicycle Coalition, aka CalBike, continues to push for increasing funding for the Active Transportation Program, which currently receives $120 million per year. The bike coalition wants the state to add $100 million to the program, which sounds like a lot but is roughly one percent of the total transportation budget—even though bike and […]