Breaking: Last-Second Bill Would Increase Active Transportation Funding

This just in: Active transportation is finally getting some love in Sacramento. A bill was introduced today to double the funding available for projects and programs that encourage people to walk or ride bikes by making streets and paths safe and comfortable for them.

Screen Shot 2015-09-04 at 2.41.04 PMAssemblymembers Eduardo Garcia, (D-Coachella), Autumn Burke (D-Los Angeles), and David Chiu (D-San Francisco) introduced A.B. X1-23 this afternoon. The last-minute bill, part of the special session on transportation called by Governor Brown to discuss transportation funding in California, is the first one to directly address making streets and roads safe for people who don’t drive cars. It’s so new it’s not even up on the state’s legislative information website yet.

“We believe that, in the ongoing conversations about generating dollars for transportation, we cannot forget the nonmotorized portion of our stakeholders,” said Garcia. “As we discuss future funding for transportation, we want to make sure we recognize that nonmotorized transportation plays a key role. It’s important for climate change policy, it’s important for public health–including obesity–and it’s important for folks with disabilities.”

The bill would double the amount of money in the Highway Transportation Account that is allocated to the Active Transportation Program, which funds projects that encourage and promote walking and riding bikes. The bill also incorporates assurances that the funding would be available to disadvantaged communities.

“This bill has a direct correlation with other state policies,” said Garcia, including climate change policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and Caltrans goals to double the portion of trips made by bicycling and walking.

The bill seeks to do a number of things:

  • Increase funding available to the Active Transportation Program, which currently receives around $120 million per year. That’s roughly one percent of the total transportation budget, although bike and walk trips together account for nearly 19 percent of all trips made in the state.
  • Ensure local agencies can compete for the funds, giving priority to walkability and bike projects that contribute to better health and economic outcomes in all communities, but especially in disadvantaged ones.
  • Include planning and technical assistance as eligible uses for funding, especially for disadvantaged communities that have no means to create active transportation plans.
  • Prioritize connections and corridors where people want to travel, as well as areas that lack bike and pedestrian facilities altogether.
  • Create a pot of funding for improving safety for children walking and biking to school.
  • Prioritize projects that “recruit, hire, and train low-income, formerly incarcerated, and/or disconnected youth and adults, and other individuals with barriers to employment.”
  • Prioritize maintenance funds for active transportation projects, so they are not just built and then left to fall apart, particularly in disadvantaged communities.

“This is an area where we have underinvested in the past,” said Garcia, “and it’s time to change that.”

The bill, introduced today, may be considered in the special session as early as Tuesday. It joins a flurry of last-minute amendments and votes coming at the end of the California legislative session, which closes on Friday.

  • Christina

    Your article indicates the bill would double the funds for ATP, but then says that the program currently gets $120M/year. The bill (now online on leginfo.gov) says $125M/year. That’s not really a doubling. Did you get advance info that turned out to be wrong, or am I missing something?

    • Christina

      I meant leginfo.ca.gov…

      • Ryan Price

        The bill is *an additional* $125m. So it’s technically a bit more than doubling.

    • Melanie Curry

      The $125 million would be an additional amount from the State Highway Fund, on top of the current $120 million that comes from the federal Transportation Alternatives program.

  • Flatlander

    Some of this funding has GOT to go towards updating the awful logo…

    • Melanie Curry

      Agreed. It seems like a minor point, but the thrown-together graphics on the Caltrans bike program website show how little attention active transportation gets.

    • Ryan Price

      Seriously.

  • Gezellig

    Awesome–thanks for the report, Melanie!

    Just sent in my email to my state assemblymember and senator.

    If anyone else wants do the same, check out Ryan Price’s link–it’s easy. You just input your address and it automatically populates your own state assemblymember and senator in the “send” field where you can use a template email and/or compose your own.

  • Ryan Price

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Legislative Update: CalBike Agenda for 2016

|
The California Bicycle Coalition, aka CalBike, continues to push for increasing funding for the Active Transportation Program, which currently receives $120 million per year. The bike coalition wants the state to add $100 million to the program, which sounds like a lot but is roughly one percent of the total transportation budget—even though bike and […]

CA Legislative Update: ATP, Bikes, and Budget

|
California budget negotiations have moved into high gear with the naming of Senate and Assembly members to the bicameral budget conference committee. Leaders of the two bodies named five members each—up from three in previous years—and the conference committee held its first hearing this morning. The committee’s job is to find agreement among the three […]

A Few Good Bills

|
Continuing our coverage of bills making their way through the California legislative session, today we’re highlighting some bills that we like. Some of these will likely be heard first at the Assembly Transportation Committee this Monday, April 11. Firstly, the state budget is undergoing its usual complicated negotiation process. It is made more complex because […]