Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Streetsblog California

Newsom Signs SB 79, Legislation to Spur Housing Production Near Transit

Despite fierce opposition, Newsom signs controversial legislation.

In the previous version of the legislation, almost the entire City of Santa Monica would have been impacted by SB 79. Under the amendment, only the green area along the Metro E-Line light rail line would be eligible for rezoning. Image: City of Santa Monica

Governor Gavin Newsom has signed Senate Bill 79, the Abundant & Affordable Homes Near Transit Act, a major land-use reform aimed at promoting housing construction near rail and bus corridors.

“For too long, California has poured billions into transit without building the housing density needed for those systems to reach their potential,” Newsom wrote in his signing message. “SB 79 changes that.”

Authored by Senator Scott Wiener (D–San Francisco), the new law seeks to tackle the state’s chronic housing shortage by encouraging compact, transit-oriented development. The measure will:

  • Upzone areas near transit: Allow buildings up to seven stories high within a quarter-mile of major rail or bus rapid transit stations, and up to four stories within a half-mile.
  • Empower transit agencies: Permit agencies to set their own zoning standards for properties they own near rail and bus rapid transit stations.
  • Streamline permitting: Expedite approval for housing projects located within a half-mile of major transit stops.

Wiener said the bill marks a turning point in how the state approaches land use and transportation planning in his own statement:

“In California, we talk a lot about where we don’t want to build homes, but rarely about where we do — until now,” Wiener said. “SB 79 unwinds decades of overly restrictive land-use policies that have driven housing costs to astronomical levels, forcing millions of people to move far away from jobs and transit, face massive commutes, or leave California entirely.”

The legislation reflects a broader push by state leaders to tie housing policy more closely to California’s climate and transportation goals. Advocates for denser development argue that building homes near public transit can reduce car dependency, lower emissions, and make transit investments more effective.

Still, local resistance remained strong. Outside of a few small cities on Los Angeles’ Westside, nearly every municipality that weighed in on the bill — including Los Angeles itself — opposed it. Critics said SB 79 undermines local control and could lead to inappropriate density in neighborhoods without adequate infrastructure.

Supporters counter that such concerns have been used for decades to block housing construction, worsening affordability and displacement pressures across the state.

For more of Streetsblog's coverage of SB 79:

SB 79 Passes Assembly, Still Needs Senate “Concurrence” Before the Governor’s Desk, September 11

Politics Heat Up Around SB79-Dems Support, Los Angeles Opposes, August 29

Wiener’s Legislation to Upzone Near Transit Clears the Senate (Barely), June 5

Wiener’s Controversial Legislation to Upzone Near Transit Keeps Moving with One Major Change, May 12

Wiener Introduces Legislation to Increase Housing Density Near TransitMarch 17

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Thursday’s Headlines

There's a lot happening from the PCH in the Bu, to Waymo in SD, Muni Growth and More...

November 6, 2025

Talking Headways Podcast: Why Are We Going Backwards?

A very special discussion about why America keeps building highways, how President Trump is targeting transit and how we can all get a better federal transportation bill if we want it.

November 6, 2025

Transit Wins Big Again In Local Elections Across America

Several candidates who ran on ambitious transportation reform platforms won at the ballot box on Tuesday — but even more communities said yes to supporting transit directly.

November 5, 2025

Grand Avenue’s Future  — What Do You Think?

Despite years of planning and public meetings, the City has never surveyed residents or businesses to collect meaningful, systematic input on its design or possible alternatives.

November 5, 2025
See all posts