Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Safety

Federal Safety Officials Knew SUV Design Kills Pedestrians and Didn’t Act

Photo: Rebranding Driving

As pedestrian deaths have soared in the U.S., the message most Americans hear is that people on foot only have themselves to blame.

Helped along by public officials willing to publish unsubstantiated hokum about "drunk pedestrians," media outlets like the Today Show made "distracted walking" out to be the real public safety threat.

More recently, solid research has identified very different causes contributing to the rise in pedestrian fatalities. A recent report by the Insurance Institute for Auto Safety found that the growth in SUV sales explains a significant share of the increase in pedestrian deaths.

Now an excellent investigative report by the Detroit Free Press and USA Today reveals how the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration knew about the risks of SUVs for years -- and did nothing.

A 2015 NHTSA report reviewed a range of research showing that people are two to three times more likely to be killed when struck by an SUV than by a typical passenger car. For children, there's an even greater four-fold disparity in mortality. The finding "has not been widely shared," the papers report.

That year, SUV sales overtook sales of sedans in the U.S., continuing a decade-long trend.

At around the same time, the NHTSA did announce a plan to score vehicles on pedestrian safety, but the safety rating for people outside the vehicle never took hold. In Europe, automakers must meet pedestrian impact standards, which has never been the case in the U.S.

The new score was supposed be added this year but has gone nowhere under the Trump administration, the Freep reports:

NHTSA did not respond to questions about what caused the delay, although the agency has been without a permanent administrator since President Donald Trump took office. In a statement to the Free Press this week, the agency said it is "working on a proposal for a standard that would require protection against head and leg injuries for pedestrians impacted by the front end of vehicles."

An NHTSA official did say that the new standard will be discussed this summer -- but the meeting hasn't been scheduled.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

UC Berkeley Report Says California Transportation Policy Is Still Built for Cars — and It’s Deepening Inequality

"An Abundance Agenda" calls for a rethink of how the state plans, funds, and measures transportation.

January 22, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines

What does it take for a city to make progress on Vision Zero?

January 22, 2026

SPUR Talk: What Can the State Learn from HSR About doing Megaprojects Right?

It's getting done, but it's been a slog. What can the state do differently on future megaprojects to avoid so much delay and cost overrun?

January 21, 2026

Op/Ed: More Questions About San Diego’s Airport-Downtown People Mover, Answered

Following up on a column from last year, Alex Wong answers the questions and critiques of Ride SD's position that a people mover is needed for the San Diego Airport.

January 21, 2026

Extending the Foothill A Line Hasn’t Been Forgotten

Plans are underway to get the track built to Claremont, and stakeholders remain hopeful that Montclair can make a comeback.

January 21, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

More changes for bullet train, more money burnt on highway widenings, more...

January 21, 2026
See all posts