Sorry Jerry, Sometimes Better Isn’t Good Enough

Jerry Brown, on his way home from voting for Jerry Brown, in 2010. Image:## Justin Sullivan/Getty Images via Zimbio##
Jerry Brown, on his way home from voting for Jerry Brown, in 2010. Image:## Justin Sullivan/Getty Images via Zimbio##

Yesterday, the administration responded to the critique that Governor Jerry Brown’s proposed budget does not advance the state’s stated goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by increasing the safety and comfort of those that walk and bicycle.

While the op/ed, written by California State Transportation Agency Secretary Brian Kelly, only directly addresses a different opinion piece in the Sacramento Bee; its message is for everyone that is taking issue with the lack of money for sidewalks and bike lanes in the proposed spending plan.

Simply put, the message is this:

The Brown administration created the nation’s largest Active Transportation Program in 2013, dedicated to providing about $120 million each year to develop safe bicycle and pedestrian facilities in communities throughout California…

…California is leading the nation in bicycle and pedestrian facility investment. The governor’s proposed budget for active transportation projects brings the total programmed since 2013 to about $720 million.

While it is laudable that the Governor and his administration are putting more money into active transportation than his predecessors, that is not what Bee opinion writer Daniel Weintraub nor other critics, including Melanie Curry here at Streetsblog California, were talking about. You can read Curry’s critique here and listen to an episode with Curry and myself discussing this issue at #DamienTalks here.

Doing better than Governor Schwarzenegger is great, but that’s not the bar that we hold for Brown.

The budget, coming just weeks after Brown and California were hailed as worldwide leaders on climate change shows none of the vision that were present at the climate talks in Paris. Instead, even with a $3 billion increase in overall funding for transportation, there is no increase in funding the most environmentally friendly way of getting from place to place.

Again, there is no doubt that Jerry Brown and his administration are doing better on this front than the administration’s of Schwarzenegger, Davis, Wilson and others.

But in this case, better isn’t good enough.


2 thoughts on Sorry Jerry, Sometimes Better Isn’t Good Enough

  1. Yes, I totally agree with Kelly that the ATP is great. As such, why not propose a massive increase in the program’s budget to make it even greater, and fund the huge percentage of applications for ATP projects that are being submitted and scoring highly but still not making the cut? After just 2 years in existence the demand has already been shown to be far greater than the existing program funding can handle.

  2. That’s a very clever choice of photos for this article. Those of us who live in the hills of Oakland know what it is to have to walk down the middle of the road because there’s no sidewalks at all :-/

Comments are closed.


CA Transportation Funding Should Reflect State Goals

Transportation funding in California has, as SBCA readers must know by now, reached a “crisis.” Shrinking gas tax revenues, combined with an increasing reliance on local sales taxes limited to specific transportation projects, have left our overbuilt and under-maintained highways, roads, and bridges without enough funds to keep them in a basic state of good repair. […]

Governor’s Budget Revision: Nothing New for Transportation

Governor Brown issued his May revision of the state budget proposal, and in terms of transportation, it’s pretty much the same story we told in January. That is, he proposes a variety of new revenues, including a “road improvement charge” and higher gas taxes, to fix California’s transportation infrastructure. But the revision shows no fundamental […]

Open Thread: Governor Brown’s Plan to Fund Transportation

Yesterday, word leaked that Governor Jerry Brown was finally submitting his own plan to try and fill the state’s looming $59 billion funding hole. His plan, a mix of fee increases, tax increases and funding from the state’s cap-and-trade funds, would raise roughly $3.6 billion per year. Critics on the left say the plan is […]